Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-04-18 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1994-04-18 House Journal Page 3567 HB 392 Representative Parnell brought up reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 392(FIN) am (page 3521). The following was again before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 392(FIN) am "An Act relating to the confidentiality of permanent fund dividend application information; relating to the permanent fund dividend program; and providing for an effective date." Representative Parnell moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 392(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding action in adopting Amendment No. 6 as amended (page 3518). Representative B.Davis objected. The question being: "Shall CSHB 392(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding action in adopting Amendment No. 6 as amended?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 392(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second to Rescind Previous Action on Amendment No. 6 as amended YEAS: 27 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Barnes, Brown, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Williams Nays: Brice, Carney, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Sitton, Willis Excused: Nordlund, Vezey 1994-04-18 House Journal Page 3568 HB 392 Absent: Davidson, Foster, Hoffman, Ulmer And so, the motion passed. Representative Parnell moved and asked unanimous consent to rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 6 as amended. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 6 as amended?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 392(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Rescind Previous Action in adopting Amendment No. 6 as amended YEAS: 20 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Martin, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Moses, Navarre, Nicholia, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Excused: Nordlund, Vezey And so, the motion passed. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 392(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 6 as amended YEAS: 18 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Moses, Navarre, Nicholia, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis 1994-04-18 House Journal Page 3569 HB 392 Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Martin, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Williams Excused: Nordlund, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 6 as amended was not adopted. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 392(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 7. Representative Parnell objected. The question being: "Shall CSHB 392(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 7?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 392(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second for Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Williams Excused: Nordlund, Vezey And so, the motion failed. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 392(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1994-04-18 House Journal Page 3570 HB 392 CSHB 392(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 31 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brown, Bunde, Carney, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brice, Davidson, Davies, Grussendorf, Mackie, Sitton, Ulmer Excused: Nordlund, Vezey And so, CSHB 392(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clauses. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 392(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.